Boston vs San Francisco

Massachusetts Legal but Limited | California Legal but Limited

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal advice. Verify with your local government.

Boston, Massachusetts
Status Legal but Limited
Permit Fee $25 registration fee
Tax Rate 6.5% state excise + 6% city convention center tax
Day Limit No limit
Renewal Annual
Platform Tax Yes
Max Fine $300/day for unregistered listing
San Francisco, California
Status Legal but Limited
Permit Fee $450 registration fee
Tax Rate 14% Transient Occupancy Tax
Day Limit 90 days/year
Renewal Every 2 years
Platform Tax Yes
Max Fine $1,000/day for illegal hosting

Both cities have comparable STR regulatory environments.

Boston Overview

Only primary-residence units may be listed as STRs. Investor-owned (non-owner-occupied) short-term rentals are prohibited. Must register with the city and carry $1M liability insurance.

Full Boston guide →

San Francisco Overview

Primary residence only, with a 90-day cap on unhosted stays (unlimited for hosted stays). Hosts must register, carry $500K liability insurance, and pass a fire/safety inspection. Rent-controlled units face additional restrictions.

Full San Francisco guide →

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it easier to Airbnb in Boston or San Francisco?
Boston is classified as "Legal but Limited" while San Francisco is "Legal but Limited." Boston's permit fee is $25 registration fee compared to $450 registration fee in San Francisco.
Which city has higher STR taxes — Boston or San Francisco?
Boston charges 6.5% state excise + 6% city convention center tax, while San Francisco charges 14% Transient Occupancy Tax. Compare the full breakdown in the table above.
Which city has stricter fines for illegal short-term rentals?
Boston: $300/day for unregistered listing. San Francisco: $1,000/day for illegal hosting.